Difference between revisions of "LS-685~U"
RadioNerds (talk | contribs) |
|||
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Useful Modifications== | ||
+ | Al Klase - N3FRQ | ||
+ | 10 May 2012 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Most back-pack radios were not designed for loudspeaker operation, but there are a lot of situations where a speaker is a handy addition. Something like an LS-166 will plug right in, but there generally isn't enough audio to make it as loud as you'd like. Plus, the damn thing weighs 3 1/2 pounds. (Just the thing for hand-to-hand combat.) Alex, K2AJR showed up with an LS-685 at the recent MTA meet in northern NJ. He later emailed me regarding an E-bay seller who had them two-for-$20, shipped. I ordered a pair immediately. They arrive the other day. This speaker was designed to be used with some component of the Singars family. It's plastic and weighs 1 pound. The connector is wired strangely, and was designed to NOT mate with the standard U-228 we all know and love. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Disassemble the connector, and move the wire on PIN-E to PIN-B. While the connector is apart, grind away the extra locking lug adjacent to PIN-E. This make it a U-229 equivalent. The cord on the first speaker I worked on was defective., There had to be some reason the Army threw it away. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Connected to a PRC-77, the LS-685's acoustic output measured within a dB or so of my LS-166. However, when connected to my PRC-104 the LS-685 | ||
+ | was 10dB louder, a welcome improvement. A quick measurement of the speakers impedance showed 200-300 ohms, versus 600 for the LS-166. So if | ||
+ | the radio has a lower output Z, this speaker will be louder. 6 ounces of the weight of the stock speaker is the heavy shielded coil cord. I went with a lighter cord, and cut the total weight to 11 ounces. The speaker has a built-in belt clip on the back, which in turn has a key-hole punch out that can be hooked over a handy screw. I think I like it! | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{pdf|LS-685-U_-_Useful_Modifications.pdf|Useful Modifications by N3FRQ (same as above)}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
[[Category:Military/Speakers]] | [[Category:Military/Speakers]] | ||
− | + | {{DISPLAYTITLE:LS-685/U}} | |
− |
Latest revision as of 00:16, 22 October 2013
Useful Modifications
Al Klase - N3FRQ 10 May 2012
Most back-pack radios were not designed for loudspeaker operation, but there are a lot of situations where a speaker is a handy addition. Something like an LS-166 will plug right in, but there generally isn't enough audio to make it as loud as you'd like. Plus, the damn thing weighs 3 1/2 pounds. (Just the thing for hand-to-hand combat.) Alex, K2AJR showed up with an LS-685 at the recent MTA meet in northern NJ. He later emailed me regarding an E-bay seller who had them two-for-$20, shipped. I ordered a pair immediately. They arrive the other day. This speaker was designed to be used with some component of the Singars family. It's plastic and weighs 1 pound. The connector is wired strangely, and was designed to NOT mate with the standard U-228 we all know and love.
Disassemble the connector, and move the wire on PIN-E to PIN-B. While the connector is apart, grind away the extra locking lug adjacent to PIN-E. This make it a U-229 equivalent. The cord on the first speaker I worked on was defective., There had to be some reason the Army threw it away.
Connected to a PRC-77, the LS-685's acoustic output measured within a dB or so of my LS-166. However, when connected to my PRC-104 the LS-685
was 10dB louder, a welcome improvement. A quick measurement of the speakers impedance showed 200-300 ohms, versus 600 for the LS-166. So if
the radio has a lower output Z, this speaker will be louder. 6 ounces of the weight of the stock speaker is the heavy shielded coil cord. I went with a lighter cord, and cut the total weight to 11 ounces. The speaker has a built-in belt clip on the back, which in turn has a key-hole punch out that can be hooked over a handy screw. I think I like it!